#1
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:28 AM
Be sure to check out the Trebuchet's specs and background info here.
#2
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:30 AM
#3
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:36 AM

#4
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:39 AM
#5
Posted 28 September 2012 - 11:17 AM
What still bothers me is the size of the twin chest 'missile boxes'. For a 'mech that is supposedly first and foremost a 'LRM Boat', the visual emphasis seems to be on the arm mounted Medium Lasers. As it stands right now, the LRM 'doors' looks more like portholes for RACs than for double shots of 15 missiles.
I'm not debating the design of the LRM racks (that's already an old discussion on these boards), I'm purely looking at the size and emphasis of the space dedicated to the weapons systems on this 'mech.
#6
Posted 28 September 2012 - 12:32 PM
#7
Posted 28 September 2012 - 01:53 PM
The weapon in the right arm looks to be modular like the stinger light mech medium laser in the intent that it could be dropped or rapidly changed.
Overall the design looks quite functional for the intended purpose of combat.
Oh and puppies have big feet and they aren't slow.
#8
Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:44 PM
streetfighterguy, on 28 September 2012 - 01:53 PM, said:
The weapon in the right arm looks to be modular like the stinger light mech medium laser in the intent that it could be dropped or rapidly changed.
Overall the design looks quite functional for the intended purpose of combat.
Oh and puppies have big feet and they aren't slow.
I'm mostly confused by the huge difference in size between the laser in the right arm and the one in the left arm, don't know what type of lasers those are supposed to be though, since it's not the standard configuration with three medium lasers.
You'll have to show me some of those fast puppies with giant feet
#9
Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:55 PM
It has no freakin' neck.
The helmet design, the only distinctive feature retained, is not obvious from all angles.
The arms things just bug me. I don't know what they're supposed to be.
One of the Med. Lasers seem to be missing. (shouldn't there be two on one hand or am I mis-remembering?)
It does not look like a fire support mech, which makes it a visual design fail.
I know it's way, way too late to fix this before launch but...well, just so you know. It's not right, as is. Did your QA call this out earlier in the design process? I mean, we're seeing this pretty close to release, right? Too late to fix?
#10
Posted 28 September 2012 - 03:54 PM
Also the other assumption is their autoload system for the missles. It would function better with less barrels on the launcher if they are shot in groups of 3 volleys reducing the required surface area needed for the system yet providing the same effective damage.
Big feet, who knows... since it is a missle launching platform maybe the big feet are to keep it planted, just like puppies
#11
Posted 28 September 2012 - 05:32 PM
#12
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:04 PM
C´me on, if the laser on the right masses 1 ton, the one on the left can mass no more than 200 kg, more spacy construchtion can´t account for _that_ much of a difference in size.
The ´box´ on the right arm, where a hand is supposed to be, irks me only a little. I assume there is a "hardpoint" for mounting a weapon there, so it will look similar to the left. Still not sure why the hand had to go?
The torso mounted launcher looks a bit better than on the bios, I still don´t like it, but I think I can (have to?) live with it.
Very stocky overall and the arms are bloody big. It doesn´t realy carry the "I am a reasonable fast mover" image at all. Bit feets, I can live with, ground preassure and all that, you know. On the other hand, removing those plates under the feet would make them look more sleek, I guess.
Conclusion: I am meh about the design (not the mech itself, the Treb is a fine fire support mech)
#13
Posted 29 September 2012 - 06:43 AM
Maybe it accidently isn´t the stock version? Could be a large Laser in the right arm and a small laser on the left. The left arm laser looks a lot like the one on the Awesome...
#14
Posted 29 September 2012 - 07:08 AM
Dunkelzahn, on 28 September 2012 - 10:04 PM, said:
Conclusion: I am meh about the design (not the mech itself, the Treb is a fine fire support mech)
The Trenchbucket has never had a right hand.. even in the original TRO.. so that is the MWT Art team staying consistent with the 'theme' of the Trebby.
Personally, I think the Turnarounds look better then the Bios... I like the way the volley launchers look when, essentially, stuck in a box.. perhaps we could get that revision on the Catapult? (Oh no...I just opened that can of worms again).
Edit: Also, maybe turn the lens flare down a bit?
Edit.. also, Screenshot for Mater.. just in case he hasn't seen it yet:

#15
Posted 29 September 2012 - 08:32 AM
Teranika, on 29 September 2012 - 07:08 AM, said:
Yeah, my memory is playing tricks on me again. I _knew_ I should have looked it up in the TR before posting
#16
Posted 29 September 2012 - 07:27 PM
I don't know, the right hand laser assembly should be a double, so maybe that's causing the size discrepancy. Most of the extra space is cooling jacket, whereas the left arm ML has the advantage of being able to piggyback on the LRM15's cooling apparatus?
#17
Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:51 AM

#18
Posted 30 September 2012 - 10:12 AM
#19
Posted 30 September 2012 - 08:37 PM
Grakka, on 29 September 2012 - 06:43 AM, said:
Maybe it accidently isn´t the stock version? Could be a large Laser in the right arm and a small laser on the left. The left arm laser looks a lot like the one on the Awesome...
There are... reasons... for weapon size discrepancy, which I cannot comment on further but I'm excited to mess around with if it doesn't get altered. That part doesn't worry me.
The turnaround makes it look more squat than I'd thought, but I still like it. I still really dig the chest cavity. -bites tongue on more in-depth beta commentary-

les Trente Sale : the Dirty Thirty
RA: defender of JagerMechs. Tester of betas. Acolyte of oldtech. 1BB comms guy.
#20
Posted 01 October 2012 - 03:30 AM
Wish the helmet was a bit more prominent and less flat-looking. From a top-down or isometric view, it may not be visible enough as-is to distinguish it as a Trebuchet. The whole "no neck" design aesthetic kind of messes that up.
The rest is a bit blockier than I would have expected (over-sized shoulders and such), but not a big deal in my book.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















